Stand in the Gap Today 10/13/15

Did you know that multiple Congressional leaders sent a letter to Ukraine Parliament leaders urging the inclusion of sexual orientation and gender identity protection laws into their new constitution? Learn more about this and find out what guest speaker, JR McGee, former military defense consultant, predicts about the emergence of Russia in the Middle East and the exodus of US influence impacting freedom as we have known it

Ukraine Letter from Congress

His Excellency Volodymyr Gruysman
Chairman, Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine
01008 Kyiv-8, 5 Hreshevskoho Street
Ukraine
Dear Chairman Gruysman,

We write today to urge you to ensure that as legal and constitutional reforms advance in Ukraine, the principles of equality and non-discrimination in human rights and state protection become firmly entrenched in Ukrainian law.  We support the enjoyment of constitutionally protected rights of all Ukrainian citizens without discrimination. We applaud the prohibition of discrimination on the grounds of “gender, race, skincolor, ethnic or social origin, genetic features, language, religion or belief, political or other opinion, belonging to indigenous peoples and national minority, material standing, residence, disability, age or other grounds” in Article 42 of the draft of the new Constitution.  However, the draft does not explicitly ban discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity.  This is a prime opportunity to send a message that violence and discrimination against LGBTI people is not acceptable.

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LGBTI) people in Ukraine endure regular discrimination and violence for which there is rarely accountability.  The most recent example was the June 2015 Kyiv Equality March, which was marred by violent attacks in which nearly two dozen police officers and participants were injured.  This attack was clearly targeted at LGBTI people and those who support and promote their rights.

The Ukrainian government has a “compelling positive obligation” to protect all citizens, including the LGBTI community, from discrimination and violence, as is established by the European Convention on Human Rights and numerous other international human rights treaties to which Ukraine is a party.  The spate of several anti-LGBTI attacks in Ukraine underscore the need for a comprehensive anti-discrimination provision in the Constitution that explicitly protects everyone.
We respectfully call on you and your colleagues in the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine to include non-discrimination provisions that ensure sexual orientation and gender identity as specific and enumerated grounds for protection in the new Constitution.  It would expand protections under the law for all Ukrainian citizens, based on the premise that all human beings have dignity and merit equal access to justice.
As a country, we have evolved over time on questions of fairness and equality and increasingly see those principles as critical to economic growth, sound policy and relations between people.  It is a long-term task to eliminate inequalities, which we continue to pursue.  We ask that the Ukrainian Rada join us in this pursuit, in the interest of the Ukrainian people and of our strengthened bilateral relationship.
Sincerely,
David Circilline
Mark Takano
Raul M. Grijalva
Alan Lowenthal
Jared Polis
Jim McDermott
Mark DeSaulnier
Keith Ellison
Dina Titus
Eleanor Holmes Norton
Jackie Speier
James P. McGovern
Patrick Murphy
Eliot L. Engel
Sheila Jackson Lee
Nadia M. Velazquez
Elizabeth H. Esty
Marcy Kaptur
Mike Quigley
Kyrsten Simema
James R. Langevin
Charles B. Rangel
Zoe Lofgren
Bill Pascrell, Jr.
Mark Pocan
Judy Chu
Chelsie Pingree
Bill Foster
Steve Cohen
Katherine M. Clark
Bobby L. Rush
William R. Keating
Adam B. Schiff
Michael E. Capuano
Jan Schakowsky
Sean Patrick Maloney
Theodore E. Deutch
Jarrold Nadler
Michael M. Honda
Dan Kildee
 

Stand in the Gap Today 10/12/15

Ready to hear some good news today? Peggy Nienaber, current Chief of Program & Operations Manager for Faith and Action in our nation’s Capital, joins the program to tell us about two upcoming events on the Hill: A Live Nativity and the National Bible Reading Marathon!

Marriage, A Wolf, and a Little Red Riding Hood

Since I was a boy, I have always loved the literary genre of fables – fictional stories featuring animals with human qualities meant to illustrate some moral maxim. Like parables, such stories are never intended to convey meaning in every detail. Yet, much of it may draw, even in unsuspecting ways, the reader to precepts or principles pertinent to circumstances behind the story. Such is the following submission of a new take on Little Red Riding Hood.

-Dr. Mark Creech,  founder of Christian Action League (www.christianactionleague.org)

*****

Once upon a time there was a dear little girl who loved her grandmother supremely. The grandmother had given to her a little cap of red velvet, which suited her so well she would never wear anything else. Thus, everyone called her Little Red Riding Hood.

One day her father and mother said to her, “Come Little Red Riding Hood, here is a basket of cookies, assorted nuts, fruit and other goodies. Take them to your grandmother and enjoy them with her.”
Grandmother lived far out in the woods and Little Red Riding Hood had never thought much about the dangers she might encounter as she entered the forest. Soon she would meet a wolf, a wicked creature indeed.

“Good day, Little Red Riding Hood. Where are you headed so early in the day?” the wolf said.

“Good morning to you, Mr. Wolf,” said Little Red Riding Hood. “I’m on my way to my grandmother’s house.”

“What is it that you have in the basket?” he asked.

“A basket of many blessings,” she replied. “I plan to enjoy all of them with my wonderful grandmother.”

“Where does your grandmother live?” asked the wolf.

“Her house, picturesque, stands under the shade of a beautiful grove of strong oak trees, where refreshing waters pass in a brook, flowers grow, and the birds sing. Surely you’ve seen it before,” Little Red Riding Hood replied with innocent charm.

The wolf thought to himself, “What a tender, impressionable and naive child. What a nice mouthful she will be when I eat her. She will be a much better meal than the old woman. But if I am to have her, I must work craftily, so I might consume them both.”

For a little while longer the wolf spoke with Little Red Riding Hood, mostly telling her about the way wolves are wrongly perceived by people. “Wolves are nothing to be feared, they just want to be treated like everybody else,” he told her.

While on her way, Little Red Riding Hood pondered, “Yes, I think I can understand how the wolf must feel. Perhaps he is a victim, as he says, and his way is not decadent.”

Meanwhile, the wolf slipped away and made straight for grandmother’s house ahead of Little Red Riding Hood.

When he reached grandmother’s house, he knocked on the door.

Grandmother called out, “Who is it, and what do you wish?”

“It is Little Red Riding Hood,” replied the wolf. “I am bringing a basket of goodies to brighten your day – to bring about a whole new day for you, grandmother,” said the wolf convincingly.

When grandmother lifted the latch to the door, the wolf devoured her. Then he put on her clothes, dressed in her nightgown and cap and lay in the bed as if he were grandmother.

When Little Red Riding Hood arrived at grandmother’s house she was surprised to find the door ajar. There was something strange and uncomfortable about this situation, even unnatural, she thought to herself.

As she made her way through the house, she came upon grandmother’s bedroom, and there laid her grandmother in her bedclothes with her cap pulled over her face, with the shades down, and looking inexplicably unfamiliar.

“Oh grandmother,” she said, “What big ears, eyes, hands, and mouth you have.”

“Certainly you can appreciate diversity,” replied the wolf. And just when he thought the time was right, he sprang from the bed to eat Little Red Riding Hood.

A woodcutter nearby heard her screams and rushed to save her.         Untitled

He overcame the wolf with his trusty axe. The townspeople hurried to the scene, cheered and supported the woodcutter, except for five foolish judges.

The five foolish judges declared the woodcutter prejudiced, bigoted, and intolerant. They said he had no right to defend either the grandmother or Little Red Riding Hood. They said the axe must be cast away.

Standing with the five foolish judges were also some clever foxes, relatives of the wolf, who argued the wolf’s proclivity for carnage was completely normal. In fact, to suppress the wolf’s appetites, something which was inherent to his nature, would be wrong, they said. Besides, it was claimed that grandmothers are like old traditions that need to give way to the new anyhow.

And so, on the basis of these considerations, not only did the mindset of many of the townspeople start to change, but the wolf was lauded and praised. Many townspeople would fly the wolf flag from atop their village cottages and buildings. An advocacy group called WUVS, standing for “Wolves, Underfed, Voracious, and Famished,” fought to give wolves special protections in law. And no one dared challenge the true nature of the wolf for fear his house, his livelihood, and even his freedom might be taken away.

So the years passed, grandmother was dead and Little Red Riding Hood would live her life in confusion, always in danger of many wolves and never to enjoy the basket of goodies with her grandmother, whom she had known and loved for so long.

*****

I would not do all the work for the reader here, but if it helps, in this fable of Little Red Riding Hood, the Grandmother is traditional marriage. The wolf is homosexual activism. Little Red Riding Hood is an unsuspecting public, and, in another way, children and their future. The basket of assorted goodies signifies the many blessings and joys of real marriage. The woodcutter is true religion’s opposition to so-called gay rights. His axe is state constitutional amendments to define marriage as one man and one woman. The five foolish judges are the U.S. Supreme Court justices who ruled to redefine marriage for the nation. The clever foxes are professionals who argue homosexuality is inherent, fixed, unalterable, and normal. The townspeople represent ever-changing public opinion.

 Now that you have the key, perhaps you should it read again.

Winning the War on Culture with Evangelist Dave Kistler

Stand in the Gap Today 10/09/15

Sam Rohrer and Gary Dull discuss Obama’s visit to Roseberg, OR and the chaos erupting due to Kevin McCarthy’s stepping out of the race for Speaker of the House. Why is the President seeking the “stamp of approval” from Pastors for his gun control laws?  What should Pastors say regarding this question of self defense? How should Christians think on this crucial issue?

Stand in the Gap Today 10/08/15

Today’s topic: A brief discussion on the interview between Todd Starnes and Franklin Graham regarding his father’s new book addressing heaven and hell; and President Obama’s refusal to acknowledge Christian persecution, even as breaking news reveals that ISIS crucified a 12-year old boy and his father for their Christian faith.

Stand in the Gap Today 10/07/15

Where is Russia headed in the Middle East? What does this mean for the US and Israel? Guest Dr. Jimmy DeYoung, host of Prophecy Today, joins the discussion to address these questions and more!

Stand in the Gap Today 10/06/15

This program discusses the latest news headlines like: new accusations that ISIS reports were modified to make the group appear more “favorable”; the push for more gun control laws, the investigation into the accidental bombing of a hospital in Afghanistan, and more!